Easier?

Prattle and quarrel about the fictional WW1 arcade air-battle game

Do you think that triplane II should be easier than the first one?

Yeap, much easier! The first one was way too hard!
2
9%
Hmm... Maybe a little easier.
5
23%
It should be as hard as the first one
9
41%
I'd say it could be a bit harder than the original.
5
23%
Triplane 1 was a pushover! TT2 should be a lot harder!
1
5%
 
Total votes: 22
User avatar
Silveri
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: Constellation of Small Insignificant Stars
Contact:

Postby Silveri » Mon May 24, 2004 1:14 pm

I'm sorry, but is there any gamer around anymore who uses a 28.8k modem anymore?
Evil lurker of doom.
User avatar
Tumppi
Regular
Regular
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: Finland, Espoo
Contact:

Postby Tumppi » Fri Jun 04, 2004 10:35 am

Hey, but that would be cool if you had to play couple of singleplayer mission, say training mission through and only after that you could play online. It would give some realistic feeling to it and you wouldn't have to fight against n00bs like me in internet. Everyone could get some training before screwing up a great teamgame going in internet.

Doesn't Americas Army have something like that too. Basic training after which you can play online.
User avatar
Silveri
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: Constellation of Small Insignificant Stars
Contact:

Postby Silveri » Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:10 pm

I've gathered that the whole point of AA would be to train online and then be recruited to the US army to do some real action civilian killing.
Evil lurker of doom.
User avatar
TZ
Scarred Veteran
Scarred Veteran
Posts: 1033
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Nurkka
Contact:

Postby TZ » Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:38 pm

Ahem! US does not plan to kill civilians. Why would they, that's real bad pr.
The post above should not be taken seriously.
User avatar
dekstar
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Wales, UK.
Contact:

lol

Postby dekstar » Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:28 pm

I don't think their PR can get any worse TZ, unless of course they bombed themselves somehow...
smelly?
User avatar
TZ
Scarred Veteran
Scarred Veteran
Posts: 1033
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Nurkka
Contact:

Postby TZ » Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:29 pm

Well.. actually most of the american casualties during the war were caused by themselves when they accidently killed each others... you know, mortars and other stuff like that are pretty tricky items..
The post above should not be taken seriously.
User avatar
dekstar
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Wales, UK.
Contact:

haha

Postby dekstar » Sat Jun 05, 2004 9:48 pm

stoopid americans! Why don't they just do what they're good at? Eat burgers and get fat? *no offence to anyone who is from american, and is fat, but it's the truth.* So yeah, and I didn't notice that Silveri:

I'm sorry, but is there any gamer around anymore who uses a 28.8k modem anymore?


Yes. ME! although technically it's a 56k modem, we just have the worst lines here, which brings it down to 28.8k. Oh well, broadband in September!!
smelly?
User avatar
Silveri
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: Constellation of Small Insignificant Stars
Contact:

Postby Silveri » Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:19 am

Actually, I've understood that the UK has the highest percentage of fat people in the world.
Evil lurker of doom.
User avatar
TZ
Scarred Veteran
Scarred Veteran
Posts: 1033
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Nurkka
Contact:

Postby TZ » Sun Jun 06, 2004 12:00 pm

No I'm pretty sure US is the first and Finland is the second.
The post above should not be taken seriously.
User avatar
Silveri
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: Constellation of Small Insignificant Stars
Contact:

Postby Silveri » Wed Jun 16, 2004 12:40 pm

Not true. I think that even Mexico outranks Finland. The point is that finnish people are merely overweight, but compared to the US, or UK, well - they tend towards the extremes. Haven't you been watching the fat related documents on the TV lately?

There really aren't that many grossly overweight people in Finland. Many with diet problems, poor physique, 20 kg overweight, with metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus 2 yes, but having 60-80 kg of extra weight is something of a rarity here.

The trend seems to be heading more towards gross overweight also in here, but the problem is only starting. With topics like "3 year old child dies due to extreme overweight" in the tabloids, perhaps people will start to look at their eating habits with more criticism. Or perhaps not.

I just hope that society (finnish and global) won't be divided into the grossly overweight and the anorhectically thin without having a population of normal weight people.

Sorry, I'm rambling again. :)
Evil lurker of doom.
User avatar
TZ
Scarred Veteran
Scarred Veteran
Posts: 1033
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Nurkka
Contact:

Postby TZ » Fri Jun 18, 2004 7:55 am

Agh, just checked it, you are right. Stupid radio.. tellin lies..
The post above should not be taken seriously.
User avatar
Silveri
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: Constellation of Small Insignificant Stars
Contact:

Postby Silveri » Fri Jun 18, 2004 10:56 am

Whoa, my truth quota went higher, could I even have reached the stage when 10% of the stuff that I type is believable? Nah, it couldn't be more than 7%.
Evil lurker of doom.
User avatar
TZ
Scarred Veteran
Scarred Veteran
Posts: 1033
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Nurkka
Contact:

Postby TZ » Fri Jun 18, 2004 7:01 pm

Mine is currently about 2 %
The post above should not be taken seriously.

Return to “Triplane Turmoil Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest